RealSkills • professions without the glossknowledge • research • practicefrom assumptions to evidenceRealSkills • professions without the glossknowledge • research • practicefrom assumptions to evidence
RealSkills UA

A new RealSkills direction

Knowledge and research

We bring together reliable knowledge about professions, study people’s experiences and turn what we learn into clear materials and practical trials for teenagers.

From source to personal exploration

This section will host evidence reviews, open methods, original research, professional stories, videos, photography and materials for exploring real work independently.

Section structure

What will be here

Reviews

What is already known

Accessible explanations linked to original sources, including where findings are mixed.

Research

How we test ideas

Research questions, protocols, selection criteria, ethics, results and limitations.

Stories

Different people in one profession

Working situations, expectations, challenges, career changes and different routes to satisfaction.

Practice

What you can try

Small tasks, videos, photography and materials that help teenagers test their own interest.

First project • preparation stage

The Person in Their Profession

What do people who perform well and feel satisfied with their professional lives have in common, and how can their experience help teenagers make career choices?

01

Evidence review

Interests, traits, abilities, values, working conditions and development opportunities, distinguishing robust findings, mixed evidence and gaps.

02

Original pilot

Approximately 5–6 professions and 30–40 in-depth interviews with people who are satisfied, disappointed or have changed careers. The pilot will generate hypotheses, not representative claims.

03

Materials for teenagers

Several experiences within one profession, concrete working situations and small practical trials.

Draft protocol

How the pilot is planned

Shared interview core

  • What brings satisfaction at work, and what is draining?
  • Which tasks feel natural, and which had to be learned?
  • Which conditions matter most: autonomy, schedule, pay, team or manager?
  • Which expectations were met, and which were not?
  • What small practical trial would help a teenager explore the work?

Safeguards against weak conclusions

  • Do not recruit only well-known or satisfied professionals.
  • Assess income, recognition, job satisfaction and life satisfaction separately.
  • Do not generalise pilot observations to an entire profession.
  • Develop the method with a work-psychology researcher.

Planned publications

What will appear over time

Prepared first

Evidence review

Short explanations linked to original sources, with honest limits on what is known.

Before data collection

Methodology

Participant selection, questions, measures, analysis, ethical rules and limitations.

After the pilot

Results

Main observations, simple charts and approved quotations without overstating scale.

After review

Stories and report

Different experiences within one profession, practical trials and a downloadable research report.

Ethics and privacy

Separate consent for participation, quotations and video

Participants must understand the purpose, use of data and their right to withdraw. Public quotations, photographs and video will require separate consent. Eye colour, hair colour, blood type and genetic data will not be included: there is no sufficient basis for treating them as useful for this question.

Partnership

We are seeking a research partner

We invite specialists in work psychology, social research and educational-program evaluation to help develop the methodology and ethical protocol.

Discuss a partnership →